| >
More articles by Dave Montizambert
|
| Dave Montizambert looks at
RAW
Lighting for Digital Part 10

In the last 'Lighting For Digital' installment, after a brief selfindulgent
side trip about a bathingsuit shoot in Hawaii, we covered how to set up and
shoot a camera sensor sensitivity test, called a 'Shirley', and how to use
the images from this test to determine the optimum exposure for your system.
Now it is time to talk about how to determine your own default RAW
processing settings. You may be wondering, why do we need default settings?
Default settings are needed if we are to create and control lighting with a
minimum fuss and frustration and if we want to streamline the task of
processing RAW files. Think of it this way: if you wanted to light your
subject to have dark brooding shadows that maintain subtle detail as in
Image 1, how dark would you allow your shadows to go in terms of shadow fill
lighting? How do you know where 'just right' is? You can’t answer these
questions without the foreknowledge of how you will process the RAW files;
you need to know where you are going before you can decide on how to get
there. (See sidebar entitled 'Lighting From The Dark-side'.)
Photographic lighting is about creating and controlling lighting contrast
for the media in use. With B&W film we had many different ways of processing
and printing our images and so, to create great lighting, we needed to know
what process we were going to use. With RAW capture as our media this has
not changed; we can radically alter the outcome of our lighting during
processing with an infinite number of results. Sounds great but is really a
headache if you are trying to create great lighting for a living and still
have time left over to have a life. Better to work to a known quantity, ie
standardized RAW process settings and only deviate from these default
settings, if needed, after the fact. For everyday work I have created three
different default settings – flat, medium, and high contrast – which are
saved as pre-sets. At the beginning of the shoot, before I commence
lighting, I choose the pre-set most appropriate for the mood I’m trying to
convey with my lighting, and then I light to that pre-set. If I am unsure of
what I really want as an end result, and so know that some processing
experimentation is to occur, I am more conservative and create my lighting
close to my medium-contrast pre-set. This way there is lots of room for
experimentation after capture in my RAW processing application and/or in
Photoshop, giving the best of all worlds, choice and predictability. The key
thing to grasp here is that to do great lighting, you need a stationary
target (pre-set) to light to.
Image 3 lists my standard aim-point values for the greyscale swatches on the
GretagMacbeth 24 patch checker card. I try to attain these values with the
processing sliders and/or tone curve when processing my RAW files in my RAW
processing software (set to the Adobe RGB (1998) colour space). These are
conservative settings that work pretty well for most situations. I put them
here as a starting point for beginners; once you get a handle on RAW
processing, you should build your processing pre-sets based on your tastes
and needs. If you prefer another working colour space such as ProPhoto RGB
these numbers will be different for the same visual result. If you want to
use my aim-point values, start by changing your
RAW processing software to Adobe RGB (1998) then set your processing sliders
and/or tone curve to my numbers. Once satisfied with your settings, switch
your colour space back to ProPhoto RGB or whatever space you want – your
processing software will alter the numbers accordingly. For RAW processing
tips using Adobe Camera RAW or Adobe Lightroom, see side bar entitled
'Setting the Settings In Adobe Camera RAW & Lightroom'.
If you take my advice and establish a set of RAW process settings that work
for you, you will remove a lot of anxiety around creating with light. I hate
to leave you with a cliff-hanger but, there is another part of this puzzle
that we need to consider, and that is how do your hand-held reflective meter
readings relate to actual captured digital values and how do your default
RAW processing settings play into this? Unfortunately I’m out of time and
perhaps editorial space and so I’ll have to leave that to another time.


Page 1 -
Page 2
Join today and receive a fantastic free gift: Apply
here
|